AI search visibility report · 2026-02-18
How AI assistants see adobe.com
adobe.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 28 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read adobe.com
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is clear and professional. Jargon is used but usually accompanied by a brief description.
Schema.org Markup65/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Basic WebPage and Organization signals present in metadata, but lacks rich JSON-LD for products and FAQs.
Authority & Trust Signals80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong brand authority and clear contact/legal pages, but lacks visible publication dates for homepage content.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
High internal linking and claim verification, but lacks outbound links to third-party authoritative sources.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Copyright and promotional metadata are current for 2026, but explicit 'last modified' dates are missing.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of semantic HTML and clear heading hierarchy (H1 present, followed by logical H2s).
Entity Definition85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is perfect. About page is linked, but specific term definitions for new AI features could be more explicit.
Technical Accessibility88/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent meta descriptions and social tags. Robots.txt is generally permissive for major bots.
How adobe.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Product & Software Schema (high priority)
- Visible Freshness Signals (high priority)
- Define Proprietary AI Terms (medium priority)
- Improve AI Chatbot Indexability (medium priority)
- External Trust Citations (low priority)
How adobe.com compares to its competitors
- Canva (canva.com) — score 79/100
- Figma (figma.com) — score 79/100
- Microsoft (microsoft.com)
- DocuSign (docusign.com) — score 74/100
- Corel (corel.com) — score 39/100