AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see findlaw.com
findlaw.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 30 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read findlaw.com
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is clear and accessible for a general audience despite the technical nature of law.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD for WebSite and Organization, but missing specific content schemas like FAQ or Article on the homepage.
Authority & Trust Signals75/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong organizational trust but lacks individual author transparency on the homepage. Trust pages and contact info are excellent.
Citation & Source Quality80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High quality primary source links (US Code, Case Law), though specific inline citations are more prevalent on subpages than the homepage.
Content Freshness60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
No visible 'last updated' date on the homepage content, though the copyright is current. Recency is assumed but not explicitly signaled.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of H1 and H2 tags with clear semantic organization of legal topics.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
FindLaw is well-defined as an entity, but lacks individual author entities on the analyzed page.
Technical Accessibility90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent meta descriptions and social meta. Content is highly accessible.
How findlaw.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Expert Author Attribution (high priority)
- Surface Content Update Dates (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)
- Strengthen Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How findlaw.com compares to its competitors
- Justia (justia.com) — score 79/100
- Avvo (avvo.com) — score 47/100
- Nolo Law (nolo.com) — score 84/100
- Lawyers.com (lawyers.com) — score 75/100