AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see thegraph.com
thegraph.com has an AI visibility score of 75/100. The site passed 23 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Content Freshness.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read thegraph.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and good use of jargon definitions (e.g., explaining subgraphs). Sentence length is optimal.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD blocks were detected in the provided HTML snippet, which is a significant missed opportunity for LLM SEO.
Authority & Trust Signals65/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with 1.27T queries and 75k projects, but lacks visible publication dates and clear trust pages on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are technically specific but lack direct outbound citations to primary sources or external verification.
Content Freshness50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Content mentions 2026 context (Amp) but lacks explicit date metadata or 'last updated' signals.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of H1-H3 hierarchy and clear sectioning. Semantic HTML is present but could be more robust.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but lacks a dedicated About page and Person schema for authors.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent meta descriptions and social meta tags. Content is highly accessible.
How thegraph.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
- Surface Content Dates (high priority)
- Strengthen Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Improve Citation Quality (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How thegraph.com compares to its competitors
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- Alchemy (alchemy.com) — score 78/100
- Infura (Consensys) (infura.io) — score 39/100
- Covalent (covalenthq.com) — score 59/100