AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see dune.com
dune.com has an AI visibility score of 78/100. The site passed 30 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read dune.com
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and professional tone. Jargon is used but appropriate for the target technical audience.
Schema.org Markup60/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Basic WebSite and SiteNavigationElement schemas are present, but missing core Organization and Article/BlogPosting schemas for content.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and contact info, but lacks detailed author credentials and explicit trust/editorial standards on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are backed by internal data and case studies, but external authoritative citations are sparse in the homepage snippets.
Content Freshness95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness with multiple updates in May 2026. Clear publication dates are present.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Well-organized with clear H1-H3 hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraphs are concise.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but lacks structured Person/Author identification and a clear 'About' schema on the home page.
Technical Accessibility90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent meta descriptions and social meta tags. Content is largely accessible.
How dune.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Organization and Person Schema (high priority)
- Enhance Author E-E-A-T Signals (high priority)
- Implement FAQ Schema (medium priority)
- Define Technical Entities with Schema (medium priority)
- Increase Primary Source Citations (low priority)
How dune.com compares to its competitors
- Nansen (nansen.ai) — score 74/100
- Footprint Network (footprint.network) — score 35/100
- The Graph (thegraph.com) — score 75/100
- Token Terminal (tokenterminal.com) — score 73/100