AI search visibility report ยท 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see etrade.com
etrade.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 30 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read etrade.com
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is clear and professional, though some financial jargon is used without immediate definition.
Schema.org Markup72/100
Result: average. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present with Organization and WebSite types, but missing deeper content-level schemas like FAQ or Article.
Authority & Trust Signals75/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong institutional trust via Morgan Stanley association, but lacks individual author credentials for research content.
Citation & Source Quality70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are backed by footnotes and regulatory disclosures, though external outbound links to primary data sources are limited.
Content Freshness65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Promotional dates are current (2026), but specific publication dates for research content are not visible in the scrape.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of semantic HTML and clear heading hierarchy. Navigation is well-organized for both users and crawlers.
Entity Definition80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and clear 'About' context, though lacks specific term definitions on the homepage.
Technical Accessibility88/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social tags, though heavy reliance on JS for some interactive elements.
How etrade.com can improve its AI visibility
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Implement Author E-E-A-T Signals (high priority)
- Expose Content Modification Dates (medium priority)
- Define Key Financial Entities (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How etrade.com compares to its competitors
- Charles Schwab (schwab.com) โ score 68/100
- Fidelity Investments (fidelity.com) โ score 54/100
- Vanguard (vanguard.com) โ score 41/100
- TD Ameritrade (tdameritrade.com)