LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14

    How AI assistants see defined.fi

    defined.fi has an AI visibility score of 42/100. The site passed 8 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read defined.fi

    Readability50/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is mostly data points and labels; lacks prose for readability testing.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD blocks found in the provided HTML structure.

    Authority & Trust Signals20/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks visible trust pages, contact info, and clear author/organization credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality40/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Links to blockchain explorers act as primary sources, but there are no editorial citations or external authority links.

    Content Freshness60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Real-time data ensures high recency, but lacks explicit 'last updated' or publication dates for the page itself.

    Content Structure30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No H1-H3 hierarchy found in the scraped content; relies on flat data structures.

    Entity Definition35/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand name is consistent, but lacks an About page or formal entity definitions.

    Technical Accessibility65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good meta descriptions and social tags, but high dependency on JS for content.

    How defined.fi can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Establish Entity Authority (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Add Trust & Legal Pages (medium priority)
    • Reduce JS Dependency for Metadata (medium priority)

    How defined.fi compares to its competitors