figma.com — AI Search Visibility Report
Overall score: 79/100
AI search visibility analysis for figma.com. LLMao scored figma.com 79/100 across 8 LLM-readiness categories including crawlability, semantic content, structured data, authority signals, and answer-engine clarity.
Analyzed URL
Category breakdown
- readability: 90/100 — Highly readable, professional copy with excellent jargon handling for a technical product.
- schema_markup: 70/100 — Good use of Organization and VideoObject schema, but missing WebSite and WebPage schemas.
- authority_trust: 85/100 — Strong social proof with Fortune 500 logos and a high-profile testimonial, though trust pages are not directly linked in the main scrape.
- citation_sources: 40/100 — Lacks external citations or primary data links; relies entirely on internal product claims.
- content_freshness: 80/100 — Excellent technical freshness with 2025/2026 dates in schema and metadata, though visible 'last updated' signals are missing.
- content_structure: 85/100 — Clear H1 and H2 hierarchy with logical sections, though semantic HTML usage (aside, section) could be more robust.
- entity_definition: 80/100 — Strong brand consistency and clear role definitions, but lacks a dedicated 'About' section on the homepage.
- technical_accessibility: 75/100 — Strong social meta and meta descriptions, but uses 'noindex' directives in some Googlebot tags which may confuse LLM crawlers.
Top recommendations
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (Schema Markup): Implement FAQPage schema for the 'Use Cases' and 'Solutions' sections to capture more real estate in LLM-generated answers.
- Implement Author Schema (Entity Definition): Add Person schema for featured authors/leaders like Henry Modisett to strengthen E-E-A-T and entity linking.
- Surface Modification Dates (Content Freshness): Add visible 'Last Updated' dates to the homepage or product feature sections to signal recency to LLM crawlers.
- Strengthen External Citations (Citation & Source Quality): Include external links to industry standards (e.g., W3C for CSS) or third-party research to validate claims about 'industry leading' status.
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (Technical Accessibility): Explicitly allow PerplexityBot and ClaudeBot in robots.txt to ensure optimal indexing by the latest LLM search engines.