AI search visibility report · 2026-03-27
How AI assistants see figma.com
figma.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 29 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Authority & Trust Signals. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read figma.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Highly readable, professional copy with excellent jargon handling for a technical product.
Schema.org Markup70/100
Result: average. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Good use of Organization and VideoObject schema, but missing WebSite and WebPage schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with Fortune 500 logos and a high-profile testimonial, though trust pages are not directly linked in the main scrape.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks external citations or primary data links; relies entirely on internal product claims.
Content Freshness80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical freshness with 2025/2026 dates in schema and metadata, though visible 'last updated' signals are missing.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Clear H1 and H2 hierarchy with logical sections, though semantic HTML usage (aside, section) could be more robust.
Entity Definition80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and clear role definitions, but lacks a dedicated 'About' section on the homepage.
Technical Accessibility75/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Strong social meta and meta descriptions, but uses 'noindex' directives in some Googlebot tags which may confuse LLM crawlers.
How figma.com can improve its AI visibility
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Implement Author Schema (high priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (high priority)
- Surface Modification Dates (medium priority)
- Strengthen External Citations (medium priority)
How figma.com compares to its competitors
- Adobe Express/XD (adobe.com) — score 79/100
- Canva (canva.com) — score 79/100
- Miro (miro.com) — score 43/100
- Framer (framer.com) — score 55/100
- InVision (invisionapp.com) — score 41/100