AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see cryptoquant.com
cryptoquant.com has an AI visibility score of 78/100. The site passed 30 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read cryptoquant.com
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Technical jargon is present but generally well-explained in the FAQ section.
Schema.org Markup70/100
Result: average. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Valid WebSite and FAQPage schema present, but missing Organization and Article schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals75/100
Result: average. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and contact info, but lacks detailed author bios and editorial standards.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are data-backed but lack external primary source linking in the analyzed snippet.
Content Freshness95/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency with media mentions from early 2026 and clear publication dates.
Content Structure80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good heading hierarchy and semantic use, though some sections are image-heavy.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but lacks a formal 'About' page and Person schema for key entities.
Technical Accessibility90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Strong meta tags and social metadata; AI crawler status is unverified but likely standard.
How cryptoquant.com can improve its AI visibility
- Establish Stronger Entity Authority (high priority)
- Implement Author Schema for E-E-A-T (high priority)
- Expand Schema Coverage (medium priority)
- Enhance External Citations (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How cryptoquant.com compares to its competitors
- Glassnode (glassnode.com) — score 78/100
- Nansen (nansen.ai) — score 74/100
- Santiment (santiment.net) — score 69/100
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100