AI search visibility report ยท 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see atlassian.com
atlassian.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 25 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Readability. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read atlassian.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and professional tone. Jargon (CI/CD, FedRAMP) is used but generally contextualized within product categories.
Schema.org Markup60/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid Organization schema present, but missing WebSite, WebPage, and specific Product schemas for the featured apps.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact info and trust pages, but lacks visible publication/update dates and structured social proof on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are made regarding 'Team 26' and product benefits, but lack inline citations or links to primary data sources.
Content Freshness65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Mentions 'Team 26' (current year) and has a 2026 copyright, but lacks specific dateModified or datePublished metadata.
Content Structure95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of semantic HTML and clear heading hierarchy (H2s for use cases and teams).
Entity Definition80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Consistent brand naming and clear definitions of products, but lacks a dedicated About page link with Organization schema in the footer.
Technical Accessibility90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with meta descriptions and social meta, though AI crawler specific directives were not visible in the snippet.
How atlassian.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Product/Software Schema (high priority)
- Surface Freshness Signals (high priority)
- Strengthen Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Improve Citation Quality (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description for LLMs (low priority)
How atlassian.com compares to its competitors
- Monday.com (monday.com) โ score 88/100
- Asana (asana.com) โ score 78/100
- Microsoft (Teams/Azure DevOps) (microsoft.com)
- ClickUp (clickup.com) โ score 78/100