AI search visibility report · 2026-02-18
How AI assistants see manzas.io
manzas.io has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read manzas.io
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent readability with clear, active voice and well-handled technical jargon related to procurement.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD schema was detected in the provided HTML, which is a significant missed opportunity for LLM optimization. All tests received a score of 0/20.
Authority & Trust Signals55/100
Result: weak. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Basic trust signals like contact email and privacy pages are present, but lack of author credentials and detailed company history limits trust.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
The site makes several claims about efficiency and security but lacks external citations or primary source data to verify them.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
The site is current for 2026, with a 2026 copyright and recent pilot program mentions, though specific 'last updated' dates are missing.
Content Structure70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and sections, but the heading hierarchy is inconsistent (skipping H2s in some sections).
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The brand name is consistent, but the lack of an About page and Organization schema makes it harder for LLMs to define the entity.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong meta descriptions and social meta tags are present, though AI-specific crawler instructions are missing.
How manzas.io can improve its AI visibility
- Add JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
- Enhance Authoritative Signals (E-E-A-T) (high priority)
- Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Explicitly Allow AI Crawlers (medium priority)
How manzas.io compares to its competitors
- Loopio (loopio.com) — score 78/100
- Responsive (formerly RFPIO) (responsive.io) — score 84/100
- AvidXchange (avidxchange.com) — score 71/100
- Coupa Software (coupa.com) — score 79/100