AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see birdeye.so
birdeye.so has an AI visibility score of 59/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read birdeye.so
Readability70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity for a technical audience, though heavy on jargon without inline definitions.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD schema found in the provided HTML. This is a major missed opportunity for LLM indexing.
Authority & Trust Signals45/100
Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks clear author credentials and trust pages like editorial standards, though contact info is implied via social links.
Citation & Source Quality50/100
Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Data is primary (on-chain), but lacks outbound links to external authoritative verification sources.
Content Freshness80/100
Result: strong. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent real-time data signals, though explicit 'last updated' timestamps for the page itself are missing.
Content Structure60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Uses semantic HTML but has a broken heading hierarchy (skips H2/H3).
Entity Definition50/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is strong, but lacks an About page and structured entity definitions.
Technical Accessibility75/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social tags, but heavily dependent on JS for core data display.
How birdeye.so can improve its AI visibility
- Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Establish Entity Authority Pages (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Identify Data Authors/Analysts (medium priority)
- Optimize for Non-JS Crawlers (low priority)
How birdeye.so compares to its competitors
- DexScreener (dexscreener.com) — score 59/100
- DEXTools (dextools.io) — score 48/100
- GeckoTerminal (geckoterminal.com) — score 45/100
- CoinGecko (coingecko.com) — score 78/100