AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07
How AI assistants see scornik.com
scornik.com has an AI visibility score of 49/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read scornik.com
Readability40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Content is difficult to read with very long sentences (30.8 words avg).
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
JSON-LD is present and valid, but lacks content-specific schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals32/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact info but lacks trust pages and verifiable publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality17/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for legal claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No machine-readable publication or modification dates found in metadata.
Content Structure73/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Severe heading hierarchy issues with 36 H1 tags and skipped levels.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Good about page and team info, but schema contains template placeholder text.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and social meta tags. Content is JS-independent.
How scornik.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and Multiple H1s (high priority)
- Implement Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Add Essential Trust Pages (Privacy/Terms) (high priority)
- Correct Brand Entity in Schema (high priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence-Level Readability (medium priority)
How scornik.com compares to its competitors
- Buckles Solicitors (buckles-law.co.uk)
- gunnercooke (gunnercooke.com)
- Perez Alonso & Associates (perezalonso-abogados.com)
- Vives Pons & Asociados (vivespons.com)