LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14

    How AI assistants see korg.com

    korg.com has an AI visibility score of 58/100. The site passed 23 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Content Structure.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read korg.com

    Readability65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Text is clear but sparse. Most content is contained within image alt text rather than prose.

    Schema.org Markup30/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Only basic WebSite schema is present. Missing Product, Software, and Organization schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals55/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Basic trust signals like copyright and location are present, but social proof and author credentials are missing.

    Citation & Source Quality40/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    The site is self-referential. While appropriate for a brand, it lacks external citations or primary data attribution.

    Content Freshness95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent freshness with multiple 2026 dates and a 2026 copyright.

    Content Structure35/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Poor structure. Only one H1 found; no H2-H6 hierarchy. Heavy reliance on images for content.

    Entity Definition50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is strong, but author identification and term definitions are absent.

    Technical Accessibility75/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Meta descriptions and social meta are present, but the site structure is heavily JS/CSS dependent for layout.

    How korg.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Product Schema to Homepage Grid (high priority)
    • Implement Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Integrate Social Proof Schema (medium priority)
    • Improve Text-to-Code Ratio (low priority)

    How korg.com compares to its competitors