LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-27

    How AI assistants see upstash.com

    upstash.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read upstash.com

    Readability40/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are too long and complex for optimal LLM parsing.

    Schema.org Markup82/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Solid JSON-LD implementation with core schemas present.

    Authority & Trust Signals28/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact info but lacks visible trust pages and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality23/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks inline citations and links to authoritative external sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or schema-based dates found on the homepage.

    Content Structure94/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent semantic structure and heading hierarchy.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good organization definition but lacks author entities.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How upstash.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Link Trust Pages in Footer (high priority)
    • Implement Publication Dates (high priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Improve Sentence Clarity (low priority)

    How upstash.com compares to its competitors

    • Redis Ltd (redis.io) — score 67/100
    • Pinecone (pinecone.io)
    • Momento (momento.com)
    • PlanetScale (planetscale.com)