AI search visibility report ยท 2026-04-10
How AI assistants see swyx.io
swyx.io has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 27 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read swyx.io
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and good sentence length, though some technical jargon (LLM, DevRel) is assumed knowledge.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD blocks found in the provided HTML. This is a significant missed opportunity for LLM optimization.
Authority & Trust Signals65/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and contact info, but lacks formal trust pages (Privacy/Terms) and structured author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of outbound links to primary sources and internal projects, though formal inline citations are rare.
Content Freshness100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely fresh content with multiple updates in 2026 and a clear history of publication dates.
Content Structure75/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good heading hierarchy (H1-H3) and logical flow, though semantic HTML usage is basic.
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Shawn Wang is clearly defined as an entity, but lacks the technical 'glue' (Schema) to connect his various roles and projects for LLMs.
Technical Accessibility70/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Meta descriptions are present and social meta is well-configured, but content has heavy JS dependencies for some features.
How swyx.io can improve its AI visibility
- Implement JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
- Strengthen Entity Linking and Trust Signals (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Descriptions for Entity Keywords (medium priority)
- Enhance Semantic HTML Landmarks (low priority)
How swyx.io compares to its competitors
- Lee Robinson (lee-robinson.com)
- Brian Lovin (brianlovin.com) โ score 50/100
- Kent C. Dodds (kentcdodds.com) โ score 45/100
- Dan Abramov (danabrahmov.com)