LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see medium.com

    medium.com has an AI visibility score of 26/100. The site passed 4 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read medium.com

    Readability50/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    The text is concise but the Flesch-Kincaid score is low due to the specific phrasing used in the hero section.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD schema was detected in the provided HTML.

    Authority & Trust Signals8/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    The homepage lacks visible trust pages and publication dates, though it provides a press email.

    Citation & Source Quality18/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Minimal external citations or outbound links to authoritative sources on the landing page.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No publication or modification dates are present in the metadata or visible text.

    Content Structure30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    The page lacks an H1 and semantic HTML elements like <main> or <section> in the rendered output.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    While an About page link exists, the lack of Organization schema hinders entity definition for LLMs.

    Technical Accessibility60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent social meta and description, but robots.txt blocks major AI crawlers and content is JS-heavy.

    How medium.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Allow AI Crawler Access (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Reduce JS Dependency (medium priority)
    • Improve Trust Signals Visibility (medium priority)

    How medium.com compares to its competitors