AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05
How AI assistants see akeneo.com
akeneo.com has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 24 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Readability and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read akeneo.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Very poor readability scores. Sentences are far too long (40+ words) and complex for optimal LLM processing.
Schema.org Markup82/100
Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Excellent technical implementation of JSON-LD with multiple core and content schemas (FAQ, Organization, WebSite).
Authority & Trust Signals66/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication and trust pages, but lacks structured social proof (Review schema) and detailed author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality67/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline citations for internal navigation, but lacks external authoritative links (.gov, .edu) to support industry claims.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness with 2026 modification dates and clear publication history. No visible changelog/versioning signals.
Content Structure74/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and organization, though heading hierarchy has some skipped levels.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and organization definition, but fails on author identification and person-level entities.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and JS-independent content, though meta descriptions are overly long.
How akeneo.com can improve its AI visibility
- Simplify Sentence Structure and Readability (high priority)
- Implement Author/Person Schema (high priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
- Add Review/Rating Schema Markup (medium priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy Gaps (low priority)
How akeneo.com compares to its competitors
- Salsify (salsify.com) — score 68/100
- Contentserv (contentserv.com) — score 24/100
- inRiver PIM (inriver.com) — score 63/100
- Plytix (plytix.com) — score 74/100