LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-28

    How AI assistants see just-eat.co.uk

    just-eat.co.uk has an AI visibility score of 38/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Citation & Source Quality and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read just-eat.co.uk

    Readability60/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are long and the reading ease score is low, which may hinder LLM parsing efficiency.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    The site completely lacks JSON-LD schema markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals28/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust pages are present, but the site lacks specific contact details and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    The site uses many internal and navigational links but lacks citations to authoritative external data.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No publication or modification dates are detectable in the code or visible text.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    The heading hierarchy is excellent, but paragraph structure is too fragmented for deep LLM analysis.

    Entity Definition25/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    The brand is consistent, but the lack of an About page and Person schema weakens entity clarity.

    Technical Accessibility58/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    AI crawlers are allowed, but the site lacks social meta tags and has some JS dependency.

    How just-eat.co.uk can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Add Content Update Signals (high priority)
    • Develop a Comprehensive About Page (medium priority)
    • Add Social Meta Tags (medium priority)
    • Complete Contact Information (medium priority)

    How just-eat.co.uk compares to its competitors