AI search visibility report · 2026-10-19
How AI assistants see lido.fi
lido.fi has an AI visibility score of 34/100. The site passed 10 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read lido.fi
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely long sentences and poor Flesch-Kincaid scores hinder machine readability.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD or microdata schemas were found on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals24/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Basic contact info and terms are present, but lack of credentials and publication dates reduces trust.
Citation & Source Quality72/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of links but lacks citations to authoritative third-party academic or regulatory sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No dates or update signals were detected in the HTML or visible text.
Content Structure46/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Uses basic semantic tags but lacks sectioning and has poor paragraph structure.
Entity Definition25/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks a dedicated about page and author identification. Entity consistency is moderate.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and social meta tags, though meta description is short.
How lido.fi can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schemas (high priority)
- Add Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure and Clarity (medium priority)
- Establish a Dedicated About Page (medium priority)
- Enhance Semantic HTML Structure (low priority)
How lido.fi compares to its competitors
- Rocket Pool (rocketpool.net)
- Frax Finance (frax.com)
- Ether.fi (ether.fi)
- Binance (binance.com) — score 62/100