AI search visibility report · 2026-06-08
How AI assistants see suse.com
suse.com has an AI visibility score of 53/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read suse.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
The scraped content presents as a single massive sentence, which severely impacts readability scores for LLM parsers.
Schema.org Markup60/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD is present but limited to a single Corporation block; missing core WebSite/WebPage and content-specific schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals52/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks visible publication dates and structured social proof/author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality62/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for navigation, but lacks citations to external authoritative primary sources or data.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete absence of publication or modification dates in both visible text and metadata.
Content Structure69/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Solid semantic HTML usage with sections and headers, though some heading levels are skipped.
Entity Definition58/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Clear brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person schema for authors and formal term definitions.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent social meta and JS-independence, but robots.txt is highly restrictive against AI crawlers.
How suse.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
- Unblock AI Crawlers in robots.txt (high priority)
- Implement Comprehensive Schema.org Markup (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence-Level Readability (medium priority)
- Enhance E-E-A-T Signals with Person Schema (low priority)
How suse.com compares to its competitors
- Red Hat (redhat.com) — score 41/100
- Canonical (Ubuntu) (canonical.com) — score 42/100
- Oracle Linux (oracle.com) — score 79/100
- VMware by Broadcom (vmware.com) — score 75/100