LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-12

    How AI assistants see econlib.org

    econlib.org has an AI visibility score of 68/100. The site passed 24 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Readability and Entity Definition.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read econlib.org

    Readability35/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Very low readability scores due to extremely long, academic sentence structures which may challenge some LLM tokenizers.

    Schema.org Markup68/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid core schemas (WebSite, WebPage) are present, but the site fails to use content-specific schemas like Article or FAQ.

    Authority & Trust Signals64/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates and contact info, but lacks structured social proof and detailed author credentials in schema.

    Citation & Source Quality75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of inline citations for claims, though links to high-authority external domains (.gov/.edu) are sparse on the homepage.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Exceptional freshness with content updated within 24 hours of analysis. Clear publication and modification dates.

    Content Structure69/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML and sections, though some heading levels are skipped.

    Entity Definition63/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Consistent branding and clear about page, but missing critical Person schema for its high-profile authors.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and no JS dependency for core content.

    How econlib.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Person Schema for Authors (high priority)
    • Strengthen Organization Entity Definition (high priority)
    • Implement Content-Specific Schemas (medium priority)
    • Improve Sentence-Level Readability (medium priority)
    • Enhance External Authority Linking (low priority)

    How econlib.org compares to its competitors