AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-22
How AI assistants see arize.com
arize.com has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 26 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read arize.com
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are well-balanced for technical content, though the reading ease is slightly low (51.4).
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Excellent JSON-LD presence and validity with 22 blocks, but lacks specific content schemas like Product or FAQ.
Authority & Trust Signals54/100
Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong modified dates and contact page, but lacks Person schema and physical address. Trust pages are limited to privacy.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for claims, but lacks links to high-authority external primary sources (.gov, .edu).
Content Freshness50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent modification recency (3 days old), but lacks a clear publication date and explicit update changelogs.
Content Structure75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect heading hierarchy and good semantic HTML, but paragraph structure is extremely fragmented (avg 8.7 words).
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and Organization schema, but lacks Person schema for authors and a direct /about link in the main nav.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect technical setup with full AI crawler access, meta descriptions, and social meta tags.
How arize.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Author/Person Schema (high priority)
- Implement Product Schema (high priority)
- Improve Paragraph Depth (medium priority)
- Complete Contact Information (medium priority)
- Add Visible Update Signals (low priority)
How arize.com compares to its competitors
- Honeycomb (honeycomb.io) โ score 74/100
- Weights & Biases (W&B) (weightsbiases.com)
- WhyLabs (whylabs.ai) โ score 23/100
- Fiddler AI (fiddler.ai) โ score 36/100