AI search visibility report · 2026-10-29
How AI assistants see tokeneo.com
tokeneo.com has an AI visibility score of 42/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read tokeneo.com
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
The text is clear and simple, though very brief. Readability scores are high.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD is present for a Product, but core Organization and WebSite schemas are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals8/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
The page lacks basic trust signals like contact info, trust pages, and author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Low outbound link quality and minimal inline citations for claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No publication or modification dates are present in the content or schema.
Content Structure56/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Basic semantic HTML is present, but heading hierarchy is broken and paragraph structure is poor.
Entity Definition20/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No About page or author identification. Entity consistency is minimal.
Technical Accessibility65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good crawler access and meta description, but lacks social meta and has JS dependencies.
How tokeneo.com can improve its AI visibility
- Define Brand Entity and Organization Schema (high priority)
- Implement Verifiable Trust Signals (high priority)
- Repair Heading Hierarchy and Content Depth (medium priority)
- Add Social Meta Tags (Open Graph) (medium priority)
- Improve Outbound Citation Quality (low priority)
How tokeneo.com compares to its competitors
- Sedo (sedo.com) — score 68/100
- Dan.com (dan.com) — score 68/100
- Afternic (afternic.com) — score 69/100
- Namecheap Marketplace (namecheap.com) — score 63/100