AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06
How AI assistants see yahoo.co.jp
yahoo.co.jp has an AI visibility score of 49/100. The site passed 15 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read yahoo.co.jp
Readability50/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Flesch-Kincaid score is low and sentence length is excessively high for LLM optimization.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Complete absence of JSON-LD or any structured data markup.
Authority & Trust Signals38/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication dates and basic trust pages, but lacks author credentials and detailed contact info.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of inline citations and external links, though few are to high-authority .gov/.edu domains.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is extremely fresh with clear publication and modification timestamps for the current date.
Content Structure67/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is excellent, but the heading hierarchy is broken (80 H1s) and paragraph structure is poor.
Entity Definition35/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks a dedicated about page and author identification, though brand consistency is high.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and JS independence, but robots.txt blocks major AI crawlers.
How yahoo.co.jp can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Structured Data (JSON-LD) (high priority)
- Correct Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Establish Entity Authority via About Page (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure and Clarity (medium priority)
- Enhance Author Trust Signals (low priority)
How yahoo.co.jp compares to its competitors
- Google Japan (google.co.jp) — score 25/100
- Rakuten (rakuten.co.jp) — score 38/100
- LINE Corporation (line.me) — score 42/100
- SmartNews (smartnews.com) — score 30/100