AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06
How AI assistants see capgemini.com
capgemini.com has an AI visibility score of 73/100. The site passed 24 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Readability and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read capgemini.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Critical failure in readability. Sentences are far too long for efficient LLM processing, resulting in a negative Flesch score.
Schema.org Markup88/100
Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Comprehensive JSON-LD implementation covering Organization, WebSite, WebPage, and Article. Minor issues with missing @context in some blocks.
Authority & Trust Signals60/100
Result: average. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication info and trust pages, but lacks visible social proof (reviews/ratings) and detailed author credentials in schema.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline citations for internal navigation, but lacks external authoritative links to verify claims.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency with content modified within 48 hours of analysis. Publication and modification dates are clearly defined.
Content Structure80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraph structure is slightly weakened by very long sentences.
Entity Definition78/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page presence. Author identification is present via schema but lacks deep credentialing.
Technical Accessibility88/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence. Meta description and social meta are well-implemented.
How capgemini.com can improve its AI visibility
- Drastically Improve Readability and Sentence Structure (high priority)
- Enhance Author Credentials in Schema (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative External Citations (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (low priority)
- Implement Explicit Update Signals (low priority)
How capgemini.com compares to its competitors
- Accenture (accenture.com) — score 78/100
- Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) (tcs.com) — score 52/100
- Infosys (infosys.com) — score 44/100
- IBM Consulting (ibm.com) — score 82/100
- Deloitte (deloitte.com) — score 45/100