AI search visibility report · 2026-10-14
How AI assistants see levelframes.com
levelframes.com has an AI visibility score of 64/100. The site passed 22 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read levelframes.com
Readability70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is clear and readable, though sentences are slightly long.
Schema.org Markup88/100
Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Strong technical implementation of JSON-LD and core schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals52/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks author credentials and publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of internal and inline links, but lacks authoritative external citations.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or structured dates found on the analyzed page.
Content Structure65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good paragraph structure but semantic HTML and heading hierarchy need improvement.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent organization definition but lacks individual author identification.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and meta-data implementation.
How levelframes.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Content Freshness Signals (high priority)
- Define Author Entities and Credentials (high priority)
- Improve Citation Quality (medium priority)
- Repair Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Implement Social Proof Schema (medium priority)
How levelframes.com compares to its competitors
- Framebridge (framebridge.com) — score 69/100
- Simply Framed (simplyframed.com) — score 51/100
- Art To Frames (arttoframe.com) — score 59/100
- Frame It Easy (frameiteasy.com) — score 78/100