AI search visibility report ยท 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see draft2digital.com
draft2digital.com has an AI visibility score of 68/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Entity Definition. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Technical Accessibility.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read draft2digital.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent readability with clear, active voice and appropriate sentence lengths.
Schema.org Markup65/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Contains valid Organization and WebSite JSON-LD, but lacks content-specific schemas like FAQ or Service.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and contact info, but lacks clear publication/update dates for the homepage content.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks external citations or primary source links; claims are mostly self-referential.
Content Freshness60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Copyright is current (2026), but no specific content modification dates are visible.
Content Structure70/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of H1 and H3, but skips H2 levels and lacks semantic tags like <main> or <article>.
Entity Definition75/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and clear term definitions, but lacks a dedicated About page and author bios.
Technical Accessibility50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Missing meta description and social meta tags (Open Graph/Twitter).
How draft2digital.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement FAQ Schema (high priority)
- Add Content Freshness Signals (high priority)
- Add Meta Description (high priority)
- Expand Entity Definition via About Page (medium priority)
- Improve Citation Quality (low priority)
How draft2digital.com compares to its competitors
- Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) (kdp.amazon.com)
- IngramSpark (ingramspark.com) โ score 69/100
- Smashwords (smashwords.com) โ score 48/100
- Lulu (lulu.com) โ score 72/100