LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-17

    How AI assistants see kraken.com

    kraken.com has an AI visibility score of 42/100. The site passed 11 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read kraken.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely low readability scores due to very long sentences and high complexity.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD schema markup was found on the page.

    Authority & Trust Signals45/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust pages are present, but the site lacks visible publication dates and detailed author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality72/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible publication or modification dates were detected in the content or metadata.

    Content Structure61/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy, but lacks semantic sectioning and has poor paragraph structure.

    Entity Definition40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks a dedicated about page and author identification, though brand consistency is high.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How kraken.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Improve Semantic Content Organization (high priority)
    • Define Brand Entity and Key Terms (high priority)
    • Optimize Sentence Length for Readability (medium priority)
    • Display Publication and Update Dates (medium priority)

    How kraken.com compares to its competitors