LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14

    How AI assistants see gandi.net

    gandi.net has an AI visibility score of 74/100. The site passed 28 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read gandi.net

    Readability85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    High clarity and professional tone, though some technical jargon is present.

    Schema.org Markup80/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Good implementation of Organization, WebSite, and FAQPage JSON-LD.

    Authority & Trust Signals70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong brand history and contact info, but lacks individual author expertise signals.

    Citation & Source Quality50/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Claims are generally self-referential; lacks external authoritative citations.

    Content Freshness50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Copyright is current (2026), but specific page-level publication/modification dates are absent.

    Content Structure95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of H1-H3 hierarchy and semantic HTML sections.

    Entity Definition75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand identity and FAQ entities, but lacks detailed author/person entities.

    Technical Accessibility90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent meta tags and social metadata; content is highly accessible.

    How gandi.net can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Author Entities (high priority)
    • Expose Content Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Strengthen Organization Entity (medium priority)
    • Improve Citation Quality (medium priority)
    • Add Product Schema for Services (medium priority)

    How gandi.net compares to its competitors