AI search visibility report · 2026-10-27
How AI assistants see ceps.eu
ceps.eu has an AI visibility score of 62/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Readability and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ceps.eu
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability due to excessive sentence length and low Flesch score.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core technical schema is perfect, but content-specific markup is missing.
Authority & Trust Signals50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication history but lacks basic trust pages and social proof schema.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links but lacks citations to high-authority external domains.
Content Freshness55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The site has clear dates but the content is significantly outdated (2021).
Content Structure64/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML but paragraph structure and heading hierarchy need repair.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent About page and Organization schema, but lacks author identification.
Technical Accessibility89/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS independence, but social meta is incomplete.
How ceps.eu can improve its AI visibility
- Shorten Sentence Length (high priority)
- Refresh Homepage Content (high priority)
- Add Trust Pages (medium priority)
- Implement Content Schemas (medium priority)
- Complete Social Meta Tags (low priority)
How ceps.eu compares to its competitors
- Bruegel (bruegel.org)
- European Policy Centre (epc.eu)
- European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) (ecfr.eu)
- Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) (swp-berlin.org)