AI search visibility report ยท 2026-10-18
How AI assistants see karat.com
karat.com has an AI visibility score of 64/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Authority & Trust Signals. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read karat.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Very low readability scores due to long sentences and complex language.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but content-specific schemas are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication dates and trust pages, but lacks specific author credentials and social proof schema.
Citation & Source Quality30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Significant lack of authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.
Content Freshness70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is relatively recent with clear publication and modification dates.
Content Structure62/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good semantic HTML usage but poor heading hierarchy and paragraph structure.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent About page and brand consistency, but lacks author identification.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.
How karat.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Improve Content Readability (high priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)
- Enhance Content Schema Markup (medium priority)
- Define Author Entities and Credentials (medium priority)
How karat.com compares to its competitors
- CoderPad (coderpad.io) โ score 59/100
- HackerRank (hackerrank.com) โ score 54/100
- Codility (codility.com) โ score 71/100
- Filtered (filtered.ai)