LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-29

    How AI assistants see noom.com

    noom.com has an AI visibility score of 74/100. The site passed 25 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Authority & Trust Signals and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read noom.com

    Readability85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is well-optimized for a general audience with appropriate sentence lengths and reading ease.

    Schema.org Markup68/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schemas are present and valid, but the site fails to mark up its actual content (articles/products).

    Authority & Trust Signals52/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates and trust pages, but a total lack of verifiable contact data (address/phone) severely limits entity trust.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of inline citations and references for medical claims, though outbound links lack high-authority (.gov/.edu) targets.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is extremely fresh with updates as recent as 2 days ago, though explicit changelogs are missing.

    Content Structure85/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML and paragraph structure, but the presence of multiple H1 tags creates hierarchy issues.

    Entity Definition70/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    The brand entity is well-defined via the About page, but individual expert authors lack structured Person schema.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation. Content is fully accessible without JavaScript.

    How noom.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Verifiable Contact Information (high priority)
    • Implement Content-Specific Schemas (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Identification (medium priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Add Explicit Update Signals (low priority)

    How noom.com compares to its competitors

    • WeightWatchers (weightwatchers.com)
    • Ro (ro.co)
    • MyFitnessPal (myfitnesspal.com)
    • Found Health (found.com)