AI search visibility report · 2026-07-05
How AI assistants see seismic.com
seismic.com has an AI visibility score of 51/100. The site passed 15 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read seismic.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely low readability scores due to very long, complex sentences that hinder LLM extraction.
Schema.org Markup60/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
JSON-LD is present and valid, but lacks the core Organization and Content schemas required for LLM SEO.
Authority & Trust Signals44/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with 2,000+ organizations and trust pages, but lacks specific author credentials and clear publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links to customer stories, but lacks outbound links to high-authority external domains.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No specific publication or modification dates found in schema or visible text, despite mentions of 'Winter 26'.
Content Structure72/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is well-used, but the heading hierarchy is severely broken with 15 H1 tags.
Entity Definition40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but the lack of an About page and Person schema for authors limits entity clarity.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong meta descriptions.
How seismic.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and Multiple H1s (high priority)
- Add Core Entity Schema (Organization/Software) (high priority)
- Enhance Entity Trust Signals (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence-Level Readability (medium priority)
- Surface Content Freshness Signals (low priority)
How seismic.com compares to its competitors
- Highspot (highspot.com) — score 73/100
- Showpad (showpad.com) — score 59/100
- Brainshark (Bigtincan) (brainshark.com) — score 66/100
- Allego (allego.com) — score 61/100