LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04

    How AI assistants see slant.co

    slant.co has an AI visibility score of 29/100. The site passed 7 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read slant.co

    Readability50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are significantly longer than the 20-word target, impacting LLM parsing.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Completely lacks JSON-LD structured data.

    Authority & Trust Signals16/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks contact info, trust pages, and structured author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality32/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Contains external links but lacks inline citations or links to high-authority primary sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable or visible publication/modification dates found.

    Content Structure47/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Missing H1 tag and semantic sectioning, though paragraph structure is acceptable.

    Entity Definition25/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No About page or Person schema for authors; brand naming is consistent.

    Technical Accessibility80/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence, but meta description is too long.

    How slant.co can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Comprehensive JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Establish Organizational Trust Signals (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy and Add H1 (high priority)
    • Surface Content Recency Signals (medium priority)
    • Define Contributor Entities (medium priority)

    How slant.co compares to its competitors