LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06

    How AI assistants see coach.com

    coach.com has an AI visibility score of 51/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read coach.com

    Readability100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent readability scores and sentence length for a general audience.

    Schema.org Markup54/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present but extremely limited in scope; missing all product and content schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals34/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality12/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No detectable publication or modification dates in metadata or visible text.

    Content Structure67/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML but fails on heading hierarchy and paragraph structure.

    Entity Definition43/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand identity but lacks Person schema for authors and formal term definitions.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.

    How coach.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Product Structured Data (high priority)
    • Implement Visible Content Dates (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Credentials (medium priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (low priority)

    How coach.com compares to its competitors