AI search visibility report · 2026-10-29
How AI assistants see delonghi.com
delonghi.com has an AI visibility score of 28/100. The site passed 5 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read delonghi.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are excessively long and the reading ease score is very low, indicating complex language.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD or microdata schemas were found on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals35/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Trust pages are present, but the site lacks specific author credentials, publication dates, and complete contact details.
Citation & Source Quality30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
The site uses inline links for navigation but lacks citations to external authoritative data or primary research.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No publication or modification dates are detectable in the HTML or visible text.
Content Structure48/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is used, but the heading hierarchy is broken with multiple H1s and poor paragraph flow.
Entity Definition25/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
The brand is consistent, but the lack of an About page and Person schema hinders entity clarity.
Technical Accessibility60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
AI crawlers are allowed and content is accessible without JS, but social meta and meta descriptions are weak.
How delonghi.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Add Content Update Signals (high priority)
- Establish Brand Entity via About Page (high priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
- Correct Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Enhance Contact Information Transparency (medium priority)
How delonghi.com compares to its competitors
- Breville (breville.com) — score 58/100
- Philips (philips.com) — score 42/100
- Jura (jura.com)
- Nespresso (nespresso.com) — score 48/100
- KitchenAid (kitchenaid.com) — score 34/100