LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-17

    How AI assistants see tildes.net

    tildes.net has an AI visibility score of 57/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Entity Definition.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read tildes.net

    Readability100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear and easy to read. Sentence lengths are optimal for LLM processing.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD or microdata present. This is a major gap for LLM discovery.

    Authority & Trust Signals52/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    The site has clear publication dates and trust pages. It lacks specific contact details and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of outbound links and inline citations for community-shared content.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is extremely fresh with daily updates. It lacks explicit update signals like changelogs.

    Content Structure67/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Semantic HTML is good, but the heading hierarchy is broken with 50 H1 tags.

    Entity Definition40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    The site lacks an About page and Person schema for authors. Entity consistency is good.

    Technical Accessibility60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is accessible without JS. The site lacks a meta description and blocks GPTBot.

    How tildes.net can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Add Meta Description (high priority)
    • Create an About Page (medium priority)
    • Enhance Contact Information (medium priority)

    How tildes.net compares to its competitors