LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-11-04

    How AI assistants see sipri.org

    sipri.org has an AI visibility score of 49/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read sipri.org

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely long sentences and low readability scores make content difficult to process.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD or microdata.

    Authority & Trust Signals60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates and trust pages, but lacks structured social proof and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and formal inline citation markup.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent recency with content updated within 24 hours of analysis.

    Content Structure51/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Missing H1 and poor paragraph structure hinder semantic parsing.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good About page presence but lacks structured author and term definitions.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How sipri.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy and Add H1 (high priority)
    • Define Author Entities with Schema (medium priority)
    • Improve Content Readability and Sentence Structure (medium priority)
    • Enhance Inline Citations and Primary Sourcing (medium priority)

    How sipri.org compares to its competitors