LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05

    How AI assistants see qwilr.com

    qwilr.com has an AI visibility score of 40/100. The site passed 15 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read qwilr.com

    Readability60/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good clarity and jargon handling, though sentence length is slightly high for general readability.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD schema markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with 5000+ customers and G2 reviews, but lacks specific contact details and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality8/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks external authoritative citations or inline references for factual claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates or update signals found on the homepage.

    Content Structure75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, though paragraph structure is slightly fragmented.

    Entity Definition43/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and About page, but lacks author identification and schema-backed entity definitions.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access, meta descriptions, and JS-independent content.

    How qwilr.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Enhance Contact Information (high priority)
    • Surface Freshness Signals (medium priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Citations (low priority)

    How qwilr.com compares to its competitors