LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06

    How AI assistants see lattice.com

    lattice.com has an AI visibility score of 55/100. The site passed 18 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read lattice.com

    Readability55/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are significantly too long for optimal LLM parsing, though vocabulary is appropriate.

    Schema.org Markup80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid core schemas present, but missing specific content/product schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals22/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with customer testimonials, but lacks basic contact transparency and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality22/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks external authoritative citations and inline references for factual claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates found in schema or visible text to verify content recency.

    Content Structure80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage.

    Entity Definition70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and about page, but lacks Person schema for leadership.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation.

    How lattice.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Improve Contact Information Transparency (high priority)
    • Add Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
    • Implement Content-Specific Schemas (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
    • Optimize Sentence Length for Clarity (medium priority)

    How lattice.com compares to its competitors