LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see trb.org

    trb.org has an AI visibility score of 46/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read trb.org

    Readability40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are very long and the reading ease score is extremely low (academic/technical level).

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Total absence of JSON-LD or any structured data markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals44/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact info and social proof, but lacks structured author credentials and trust pages like editorial standards.

    Citation & Source Quality86/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of inline citations and links to authoritative external sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Visible dates are present in text, but completely absent from metadata/schema, preventing LLMs from programmatically determining recency.

    Content Structure67/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML, but the heading hierarchy is broken with 17 H1 tags.

    Entity Definition45/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is strong, but lacks structured 'About' data and formal term definitions.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full crawler access and strong social metadata.

    How trb.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Enhance Author E-E-A-T Signals (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Strengthen Entity Definitions (medium priority)
    • Improve Content Readability (low priority)

    How trb.org compares to its competitors

    • Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) (ite.org)
    • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (asce.org)
    • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (aashto.org)
    • Eno Center for Transportation (enotrans.org)