AI search visibility report · 2026-06-13
How AI assistants see deere.com
deere.com has an AI visibility score of 30/100. The site passed 7 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read deere.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to technical structure and massive sentence lengths in the scraped text.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD blocks found; the site uses outdated Microdata which is not the LLM standard.
Authority & Trust Signals18/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks clear publication dates and detailed author credentials, though contact pages are present.
Citation & Source Quality47/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for navigation, but lacks citations to external authoritative data sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates found on the homepage.
Content Structure53/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Multiple H1s and skipped heading levels create a confusing hierarchy for LLMs.
Entity Definition30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is strong, but lacks a dedicated About page link and Person schema for leadership.
Technical Accessibility68/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, but missing social meta tags.
How deere.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure and Readability (high priority)
- Add Content Freshness Signals (medium priority)
- Implement Social Meta Tags (low priority)
How deere.com compares to its competitors
- Caterpillar Inc. (cat.com)
- Kubota Tractor Corporation (kubotausa.com)
- Case IH (caseih.com)
- Mahindra USA (mahindrausa.com)