LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04

    How AI assistants see checkout.com

    checkout.com has an AI visibility score of 55/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read checkout.com

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Professional tone but sentences are slightly long for optimal LLM parsing.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid Organization and VideoObject schema present, but lacks content-specific schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals44/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality22/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates found in metadata or visible text to indicate recency.

    Content Structure67/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML and organization, but multiple H1s and weak hierarchy. score: 67.0

    Entity Definition60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency and organization schema, but lacks author identification.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and meta-tag implementation.

    How checkout.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Visible Publication/Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Implement Author/Person Schema (high priority)
    • Improve Inline Citations and Outbound Links (medium priority)
    • Expand Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (Single H1) (low priority)

    How checkout.com compares to its competitors