LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14

    How AI assistants see hp.com

    hp.com has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 22 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Readability. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read hp.com

    Readability85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    High clarity and appropriate sentence length for a commercial site.

    Schema.org Markup20/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    JSON-LD is present but functionally empty (@graph: []). Significant missed opportunity.

    Authority & Trust Signals75/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust signals via contact info and legal pages, but lacks structured author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality20/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks external citations or primary source links to verify marketing claims.

    Content Freshness90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent freshness with 2026 publication dates and seasonal sale signals.

    Content Structure80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of H2/H3 hierarchy, though semantic HTML usage is moderate.

    Entity Definition50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is high, but structured entity/author definitions are missing.

    Technical Accessibility75/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good meta descriptions and social tags, but no specific AI bot directives.

    How hp.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Fix Empty JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Define Entity and Author Relationships (high priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
    • Explicitly Allow AI Crawlers (medium priority)
    • Improve Technical Term Definitions (low priority)

    How hp.com compares to its competitors