AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04
How AI assistants see robinwieruch.de
robinwieruch.de has an AI visibility score of 65/100. The site passed 23 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read robinwieruch.de
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good sentence length and clarity, though technical complexity (Flesch 42.7) is expected for this niche.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present for WebSite, but missing critical content-specific schemas like Course or Product.
Authority & Trust Signals50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof from industry leaders, but lacks specific contact details (address/phone) and publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of inline citations and external links, though lacks links to high-authority .gov/.edu domains.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates found, making it difficult for LLMs to determine recency.
Content Structure89/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraphs are concise and well-structured.
Entity Definition58/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page presence, but lacks Person schema on the About page itself.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How robinwieruch.de can improve its AI visibility
- Improve Contact Transparency (high priority)
- Add Course and Product Schema (high priority)
- Implement Visible Update Dates (medium priority)
- Strengthen Author Entity Links (medium priority)
- Schema-enable Social Proof (low priority)
How robinwieruch.de compares to its competitors
- Kent C. Dodds (kentcdodds.com) — score 45/100
- Josh W. Comeau (joshwcomeau.com) — score 46/100
- Wes Bos (wesbos.com) — score 43/100
- Frontend Masters (frontendmasters.com) — score 53/100