AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-22
How AI assistants see ideo.com
ideo.com has an AI visibility score of 44/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ideo.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely low readability scores due to very long, complex sentences that hinder LLM comprehension.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Complete absence of JSON-LD or any structured data format.
Authority & Trust Signals54/100
Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof through client testimonials and clear contact/trust pages, but lacks structured author credentials and publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality32/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks inline citations and links to authoritative external sources, relying entirely on internal claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
While text mentions '2026', there are no machine-readable date signals (schema or meta) to verify freshness.
Content Structure71/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good paragraph structure and organization, but suffers from skipped heading levels and limited semantic HTML tags.
Entity Definition58/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and an About page, but lacks Person schema for authors and formal term definitions.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access, JS-independent content, and strong social metadata.
How ideo.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Add Verifiable Date Metadata (high priority)
- Improve Sentence-Level Readability (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Establish Author Entities (low priority)
How ideo.com compares to its competitors
- frog design (frogdesign.com) โ score 70/100
- IDEO.org (ideo.org)
- Accenture Song (accenture.com) โ score 78/100
- McKinsey Design (mckinsey.com) โ score 53/100
- Gensler (gensler.com)