AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see nazwa.pl
nazwa.pl has an AI visibility score of 63/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Content Freshness.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read nazwa.pl
Readability75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Professional tone with clear service descriptions, though some technical jargon (LXC, ECDSA) is used without immediate definitions.
Schema.org Markup40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Only basic WebSite JSON-LD is present. Missing Organization and Product schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals45/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks visible contact details and trust pages on the homepage, though social proof (1M clients) is mentioned.
Citation & Source Quality20/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No external citations or primary source links found to verify technical claims.
Content Freshness30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No specific publication or modification dates found, though 2025 is mentioned in some tracking parameters.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and clear service sections, though heading hierarchy could be tighter.
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is strong, but lacks a dedicated About page or Person schemas for leadership.
Technical Accessibility90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent meta descriptions and social meta tags. Content is highly accessible.
How nazwa.pl can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Comprehensive Schema.org Markup (high priority)
- Enhance Trust and Contact Signals (high priority)
- Strengthen Brand Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Surface Content Freshness Signals (medium priority)
- Improve Fact Verification with Citations (low priority)
How nazwa.pl compares to its competitors
- Home.pl (home.pl) — score 69/100
- OVHcloud (ovhcloud.com) — score 72/100
- Cyber_Folks (cyberfolks.pl) — score 70/100
- LH.pl (lh.pl) — score 78/100