AI search visibility report · 2026-10-09
How AI assistants see invisionapp.com
invisionapp.com has an AI visibility score of 41/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Content Freshness.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read invisionapp.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely low readability scores due to technical sentence structure issues.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Complete absence of JSON-LD or microdata schema.
Authority & Trust Signals38/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
The site has good trust pages and contact info but lacks clear publication dates and author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality64/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of internal/product links but zero links to authoritative external domains.
Content Freshness15/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No visible dates or schema-based freshness signals found, though update signals are present.
Content Structure52/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Multiple H1 tags and poor paragraph structure hinder the logical flow.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
About page is present, but the lack of Organization schema limits entity clarity.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup for crawlers and social sharing.
How invisionapp.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
- Correct Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Include Publication Dates (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Links (low priority)
How invisionapp.com compares to its competitors
- Figma (figma.com) — score 79/100
- Lucidchart (lucidchart.com) — score 48/100
- Mural (mural.co) — score 54/100
- Monday.com (monday.com) — score 88/100
- Canva (canva.com) — score 79/100