LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-22

    How AI assistants see rocketreach.co

    rocketreach.co has an AI visibility score of 45/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read rocketreach.co

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good sentence length and clarity, though reading ease is slightly low for a general audience.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data.

    Authority & Trust Signals51/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact info and trust pages, but lacks structured author credentials and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks citations to authoritative third-party sources or primary data studies.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Copyright is current (2026), but no specific publication or modification dates are present in metadata or text.

    Content Structure60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Missing H1 and has a broken heading hierarchy, though semantic HTML usage is good.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is high, but lacks structured data to define the entity to LLMs.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social meta tags. Content is fully accessible without JS.

    How rocketreach.co can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy and Add H1 (high priority)
    • Add Explicit Content Dates (medium priority)
    • Enhance Author/Entity Authority (medium priority)
    • Improve External Citations (low priority)

    How rocketreach.co compares to its competitors