AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-03
How AI assistants see jotform.com
jotform.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read jotform.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to excessive sentence length and complex structure.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present for Corporation and WebPage, but missing specific content schemas like Product.
Authority & Trust Signals45/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks verifiable social proof schema and publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality57/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for navigation, but lacks external authoritative citations for factual claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete lack of visible or metadata-based publication/modification dates.
Content Structure80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Organization is clear.
Entity Definition58/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person schema for the founder.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and social meta tags. Meta description is slightly short.
How jotform.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Update Dates (high priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure and Readability (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schemas (medium priority)
- Implement Social Proof Schema (medium priority)
- Strengthen External Citations (low priority)
How jotform.com compares to its competitors
- Typeform (typeform.com) โ score 58/100
- Google Forms (google.com)
- SurveyMonkey (Momentive) (survey-monkey.com) โ score 43/100
- Wufoo (wufoo.com)